NC4 stayed stable
Nearest-centre and classifier decisions did not diverge after clean interpolation.
Watch ten digit classes reorganize inside a neural network—then test whether cleaner geometry really means better generalization to unseen writers.
Does neural-collapse geometry continue after zero training error—and does more collapse consistently predict better held-out performance?
Every stop is a saved model state. Motion between stops is visual interpolation only.
Left: a two-dimensional projection. Right: pairwise cosines of centred class means in the full hidden space; pale lines are closer to the ideal off-diagonal value −1/9.
Two gates passed. Two narrowly missed. Nothing was redefined after the run.
Nearest-centre and classifier decisions did not diverge after clean interpolation.
Every paired long-tail run had worse final NC2 than its clean counterpart.
The direction was common, but not common enough for the frozen 8/10 gate.
Simplex proximity was not seed-universal after the first zero-error epoch.
Moderate descriptive rank association across 30 runs.
Almost no descriptive rank association across 30 runs.
The noisy-label MLP generalized much worse while its median NC2 was slightly lower than clean. That does not disprove neural collapse. It shows why collapse must be read as a multi-coordinate, regime-dependent phenomenon.
Read the complete interpretation →Question, data split, model, seeds, checkpoints, metrics, and gates were written before retrieval.
Clean labels, a deterministic long tail, and exactly 20% classwise symmetric corruption.
NC1–NC4 in nine dimensions; prediction quality on official unseen writers.
Seeds describe optimization sensitivity, not a population of tasks, people, or architectures.